2 months ago
33
ARTICLE AD BOX
AI Image Used For Representational Purpose Only
MUMBAI: The Bombay precocious tribunal has directed 2 elder officers of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC) to wage Rs 11 each from their salaries for hold successful initiating enactment against a ward serviceman who failed to demolish an unauthorised operation successful Fort.
The part seat of Ravindra Ghuge and Abhay Mantri said the token outgo was meant to nonstop a connection that tribunal orders indispensable beryllium acted upon “with promptitude”.
What is the case?
The quality concerns an unauthorised mezzanine level successful Kirti Chambers astatine Fort.Green Twig Estate Management Pvt Ltd, landlord of Kirti Chambers, had filed a suit seeking demolition of the tenant’s amerciable structure.The suit was dismissed arsenic nary statutory announcement had been issued to the BMC.The landlord appealed earlier the precocious court.On August 5, 2024, aft signaling that the BMC had initiated action, the entreaty was withdrawn. However, since nary demolition followed, the petitioners approached the precocious tribunal again.On December 23, 2025, the tribunal noted that though a speaking bid dated August 10, 2024 had been passed, nary effectual steps were taken to bring the process to its logical end. The bid had stated that if the tenant failed to raze the structure, the bureau of the Assistant Municipal Commissioner of ‘A’ Ward would bash so.
The tribunal directed Assistant Municipal Commissioner Jaydeep More to stay present. On December 24, 2025, aft it was submitted that the earlier bid had not been complied with, the seat directed the corp to initiate due enactment against More for nonaccomplishment to discharge his duties. The petition was disposed of but kept for signaling compliance connected January 30, 2026.
What is the latest order?
When the substance came up connected February 9, 2026, the tribunal examined the archetypal record produced by the corporation’s advocate.The seat recorded the pursuing timeline:
- December 26, 2025: Report prepared for transmission of the December 24 order.
- December 30, 2025: File dispatched to Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Zone-I) Chanda Jadhav.
- January 8, 2026: Jadhav signed the bid — 9 days later.
- January 27, 2026: Additional Municipal Commissioner (City) Ashwini Joshi signed it — 19 days later.
- January 28, 2026: Municipal Commissioner Bhushan Gagrani promptly directed issuance of a show-cause notice.
- January 30, 2026: Show-cause announcement issued to Jaydeep More — the aforesaid time the petition was listed for compliance.
The judges noted that the hold occurred “at the desks” of the Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Zone-I) and the Additional Municipal Commissioner (City).
Court’s observations
The seat appreciated the expediency shown by the municipal commissioner and the corporation’s advocate. However, it expressed interest implicit organization delay.The tribunal recalled that successful its December 23, 2025 order, it had already observed that municipal corporations were taking precocious tribunal orders casually and not initiating enactment successful a timely manner.It noted that:
- The learned Single Judge had earlier recorded that enactment had been initiated.
- Due to inaction successful taking the process to its logical conclusion, the petitioners were compelled to record a caller petition.
- Within six months, the aforesaid corp had overlooked orders of some the Single Judge and the Division Bench.
- When asked whether contempt proceedings should beryllium initiated against the 2 elder officers, the corporation’s counsel submitted that they would tender an apology and sought instructions regarding costs.
What did the tribunal order?
To nonstop a wide message, the seat imposed costs of Rs 11 each on:Chanda Jadhav, Deputy Municipal Commissioner (Zone-I)Ashwini Joshi, Additional Municipal Commissioner (City)The magnitude is to beryllium paid from their respective wage accounts and deposited with the Kirtikar Law Library wrong 2 days, since the bid was dictated successful unfastened court.The petition, though disposed of earlier, has been listed again connected March 6, 2026, for signaling compliance arsenic enactment is inactive not complete.
Key takeaways
The precocious tribunal tin enforce idiosyncratic costs connected officials for hold successful complying with judicial directions.Even token costs tin service arsenic a judicial connection connected accountability and administrative discipline.The tribunal distinguished betwixt punctual enactment by the municipal commissioner and delays astatine intermediary administrative levels.The substance remains nether judicial monitoring until afloat compliance is ensured.The bid underscores that erstwhile a tribunal directs enactment — particularly successful cases involving unauthorised constructions — the administrative machinery is expected to enactment without procedural stagnation oregon interior record delays.
