4 months ago
118
ARTICLE AD BOX
MUMBAI: In an unexpected turn, a woman’s existent hubby took the witnesser basal to depose connected behalf of her ex-spouse, ending a astir 17-year-old home unit case. The case, initiated successful 2009 by the woman, alleged years of torture by her archetypal husband.
She sought extortion and monetary relief, claiming she was ousted from her home. However, a Borivli tribunal ruled that with her existent hubby confirming marriage, she was not entitled to maintenance.‘Woman joined 2nd time, not entitled to maintenance’Additional main judicial magistrate B N Chikne said, “As such, successful specified facts and circumstances and the grounds connected record, it appears to maine that it is proved from the grounds and documents produced connected record, aft divorcement from the responsive No.
1 (ex-husband), the applicant (woman) performed a 2nd marriage. Therefore, she is not entitled to get attraction from responsive No. 1.” The judgement centred connected the revelation that the pistillate had entered into a 2nd matrimony portion her archetypal attraction assertion was inactive active.In her plea, the pistillate said she joined her ex-husband successful 2005 done an arranged setup. She alleged that she aboriginal recovered retired that the antheral was already joined and his archetypal woman began to predominant their home.
Along with the ex-husband, his archetypal woman would maltreatment her too. She alleged galore incidents of physical, affectional and economical abuse. In Dec 2009, the archetypal hubby was directed to wage the pistillate an interim monthly attraction of Rs 3,200 until the disposal of the case.
While the woman’s sister served arsenic a witnesser to enactment her allegations, the antheral brought to tribunal an imam who officiated the woman’s 2nd marriage, a handwriting and fingerprint adept who testified connected the signatures and thumb content connected the nikahnama of the 2nd marriage, and her husband.The trajectory of the proceedings shifted dramatically erstwhile her ex-husband produced her existent hubby arsenic a defence witnesser to corroborate their marital status. By confirming the 2nd matrimony done the grounds of the existent hubby himself, the defence nullified the woman’s presumption arsenic a babelike of her erstwhile spouse. The tribunal ruled the beingness of this 2nd union, confirmed by the antheral who entered into it, extinguished the woman's close to question further attraction oregon extortion from her archetypal husband.
